Drata Alternatives:
Compare Top 5 Best-Rated Solutions
With numerous compliance solutions on the market, each claiming to be the best, it can be challenging to find the right one without getting lost in marketing gimmicks and false promises. Drata is undoubtedly a frontrunner in the industry, but even with its popularity, it may not be the perfect fit for everyone.
If you are in search of Drata alternatives, chances are you already have certain expectations and criteria in mind. To ease your solution-shopping journey, we have compiled a list of Drata's competitors, outlining what to expect from each, their pros and cons, and how to pick the best alternative that suits your needs.
What is Drata?
Drata is a comprehensive security platform designed to help businesses achieve compliance with SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO standards. The solution integrates seamlessly with existing tech stacks, enabling businesses to monitor their IT environments, collect evidence on security controls, and streamline compliance workflows. Drata stands out with its significant automation capabilities and scalability.
Why do you need an alternative to Drata?
Despite being a leader in the compliance category, Drata is not without its limitations. As per actual user reviews from G2, some common pain points include:
The package does not offer a bundled solution, and add-on features can increase the overall cost.
Automation capabilities require manual intervention for evidence submission, risk assessment, and control mapping.
The platform does not support frameworks like NIST and CMMC at the moment.
Evidence cannot be edited once uploaded, leading to duplicate uploads for non-integrated systems.
Clunky document and policy management features hinder a seamless experience.
Drata lacks tiered escalation ability for critical or failing checks.
5 best alternatives to Drata
Sprinto
Sprinto is an end-to-end compliance automation, management, and tracking solution tailored for cloud-hosted SaaS companies. It supports and maps the requirements of frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, NIST, PCI DSS, and more, offering a comprehensive view. Sprinto empowers organizations to scale their compliance efforts without compromising engineering bandwidth. Key features and benefits include:
Pre-built, auditor-friendly compliance programs with customizable dashboards for evidence collection and editing.
Support for a wide range of preventive and defensive security controls to minimize costly incidents.
Real-time monitoring of controls to satisfy selected framework requirements.
Alerts for non-compliance issues with detailed insights into risks and criticality levels.
Role-based access for task segregation, data minimization, and risk prioritization.
Sprinto excels in use cases like data protection, gap analysis, anomaly detection, and monitoring based on G2 reviews.
Vanta
Vanta is a security and compliance platform catering to popular privacy frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more. It provides real-time security posture monitoring and risk identification, and simplifies the auditing process. Pros and cons of Vanta include:
Pros:
Continuous monitoring with alerts for violations and malicious behavior.
Data analysis for better security insights and best practices, allowing users to set security and data policies.
Inventory management for software, hardware, cloud, and mobile assets.
Cons:
Pay-per-feature model for new additions.
Steep learning curve.
Limited customization and integration options.
Hyperproof
Hyperproof is a risk and compliance platform handling multiple frameworks like SOC 2, ISO, and NIST CSF. It integrates with common cloud services to automate compliance workflows, evidence collection, and stakeholder collaboration. Pros and cons of Hyperproof are:
Pros:
Security knowledge base with training materials.
Sufficient flexibility for configuration without technical assistance.
Risk identification and classification based on different factors.
Cons:
Slow UI for certain functions.
Not comprehensive enough for some actions' scope.
Limited customization and reporting capabilities.
Thoropass
Thoropass (previously Laika) integrates with existing systems for continuous monitoring and maintaining compliance for infosec and privacy frameworks. It combines compliance automation, security questionnaire tools, and penetration testing for a seamless auditing experience. Pros and cons of Thoropass include:
Pros:
Policy setting for data governance, role-based access, and access privilege management.
Cloud environment monitoring and reporting for violations or malicious behavior.
Facilitates SOC 2 compliance.
Cons:
Limited integration options with a fairly clunky system.
Pre-built templates are more suitable for large organizations than smaller ones.
UI lacks granularity.
OneTrust
OneTrust offers a centralized privacy and data governance solution leveraging AI for improved visibility, risk scaling, actionable insights, and privacy automation. Pros and cons of OneTrust are:
Pros:
Robust and automated vendor risk management module.
Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) functionality for user request compliance.
Insightful data mapping within the organization.
Cons:
Complex UI that lacks intuitiveness.
Manual work is required for user management implementation.
Limited workflow customization for unique business cases.
How to pick a great alternative that works for you
Understanding your business's key problem areas: Addressing pain points with your team
Every successful business must identify and address its pain points to ensure continuous growth and improvement. The first step in this process is to define your key problem areas. These are the specific challenges or obstacles that your team encounters on a regular basis.
Setting criteria for success: Measuring progress toward your goals
Once you have identified your key problem areas, the next step is to establish criteria that will help you measure your progress toward addressing those challenges. These criteria can be either qualitative or quantitative, depending on the nature of the problems you are trying to solve.
Identifying and evaluating potential solutions: Making informed decisions
With your criteria in place, it's time to start looking for solutions to address your business's pain points. This involves identifying potential solutions and carefully evaluating them against your established criteria. Consider both internal solutions (changes to processes, training, etc.) and external ones (software, services, etc.). Look into user reviews, expert analyses, and case studies related to these solutions to gain insights into their effectiveness.
Engaging in discussions and demos: Ensuring a perfect fit
Before making a final decision, it's essential to engage with vendors and solution providers. Reach out to them with specific questions and concerns related to your business's pain points. Utilize free demos and trial versions to get hands-on experience with the solutions.
Conclusion
Selecting the right compliance solution is crucial for your business's success. Each alternative to Drata brings its strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on your unique needs and priorities. Conduct thorough research, explore user reviews, and leverage product demos to make an informed decision.