Slab vs Confluence

Learn more about your options and pick the best tool for your team.

Not sure if Slab or Confluence is the better fit for your needs? You've come to the right place.

Confluence is one of the oldest documentation tools and company wikis out there. It's a mature and powerful solution, and for many years, adopting it was seen as a safe option.

However, as more and more Confluence competitors enter the market, the choice is becoming less clear-cut. One notable example is Slab.

If you are evaluating collaboration tools and ended up with Confluence and Slab on your shortlist, you are not alone. In this article, we will take a closer look at both Slab and Confluence and examine their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right decision for your company.

Slab and Confluence compared

Both Slab and Confluence are designed to help teams share knowledge and organize internal documentation. Confluence has been around for almost 20 years and boasts over 60,000 customers worldwide. Slab, on the other hand, is still a newcomer.

Let's dive deeper into what Slab and Confluence have to offer and also have a look at other alternatives you may want to consider.


Slab vs Confluence

Launched in 2016, Slab positions itself as a more modern alternative to Confluence. It's designed for those who find Confluence to be too bloated — by comparison, the interface of Slab is clean and simple.

If you expect a feature-rich editor, complex hierarchical content organization, or advanced customization options, Slab is not for you. However, if you are looking to build a basic internal knowledge base, without having to invest too much time and effort, Slab can be a great option.

Why you might prefer Slab over Confluence:

What users say about Slab:

"My team finds that Slab meets our needs MUCH better than Atlassian Confluence. Slab just WORKS. I miss columns and more advanced layouts, but they are not mission-critical."

Capterra review

Looking for more tools similar to Slab? Check out this list of Slab alternatives.


Confluence vs Slab

Released almost two decades ago, Confluence remains one of the most widely used wiki software solutions today. Compared to Slab, Confluence is an exceptionally powerful and feature-rich tool. If your documentation workflows are fairly complex and you are looking for a platform to support them, then Confluence may be a good fit. It offers an extensive selection of plug-ins and macros, allowing you to flexibly adapt and extend the tool to your team's unique workflow. On the other hand, this inevitably results in a certain learning curve and makes it difficult for some non-technical people to use it productively.

Another compelling reason to choose Confluence is its tight integration with other tools in the Atlassian product suite, such as Jira. You will be able to embed Confluence pages in Jira, create Jira issues from Confluence, tag existing issues and automatically update their status, and so on.

Why you might prefer Confluence over Slab:

Looking for more tools similar to Confluence? Check out this list of Confluence alternatives.

What users say about Confluence:

"Powerful wiki software. As an Atlassian product, you can expect a full set of tools for managing access to different pages and areas across your organization, making it more appropriate for enterprises than more basic wiki software that doesn't always provide the same level of control. Another advantage is the high level of integration. 'Macros' allow users to include a variety of rich content."

Capterra review

Other alternatives

It should be mentioned that your options are not limited to just Slab and Confluence. There are many other knowledge base tools that can serve the needs of your team just as well — or even better.

For example, if you like the idea of integrating Confluence and Jira to keep your projects and docs in sync, but prefer the simplicity of Slab, consider Nuclino. Like the Atlassian product suite, Nuclino allows you to bring all your knowledge, docs, and projects together. You can create collaborative documents for every topic or project and organize them into a nested list, a Kanban board, a table, or a mindmap-style graph. This allows you to use Nuclino as more than just a wiki or documentation tool. It's a unified workspace that works like a collective brain, allowing you to bring all your work together in one place. It's versatile enough to be used to manage projects, plan sprints, onboard new employees, take meeting minutes, and more.

Slab vs Confluence vs Nuclino

At the same time, like Slab, Nuclino is lightweight and minimal by design and focuses on the essentials. It keeps its interface clean and easy to navigate, without trying to pack it with every possible feature and menu. The formatting options are simple and functional. This minimizes the learning curve for new users and helps your team focus on the content, rather than spend time fiddling with options and settings.

Slab vs Confluence vs Nuclino board view

Every document in Nuclino can be collaborated on in real time, with every change automatically preserved in the version history. Comments and mentions can be used to easily exchange feedback. Related documents can be linked together by simply typing "@" and the name of the page you'd like to link to.

Collaborative Slab and Confluence alternative

Learn more about how Nuclino compares to Confluence: Nuclino vs Confluence.

Slab vs Confluence: So which is better?

Slab and Confluence are designed with different target customers in mind and are popular for different reasons. If your team already uses other Atlassian products, such as Jira or BitBucket, then Confluence may be a good fit for you. If you are looking for a simpler knowledge base tool, without too many bells and whistles, Slab can be a solid alternative.

On the other hand, if you want the best of both worlds, consider exploring other alternatives, such as Nuclino.

Ultimately, the best choice depends solely on your team's specific requirements and preferences. We hope this article has made your decision a little easier.

Character illustration